Telugu Funda

As a follow-up to the popular Bichagadu, there are numerous anticipation for this movie. According to the producers, it serves as a distinct sequel.On May 19, 2023, Bichagadu 2 was released. Unlike its predecessor, it earned mixed reviews from critics but was a box office triumph. It is a telugu dubbed version of the film Pichaikaran 2.

Director Sasi deserves credit for creating such a unique plot. Vijay Anthony’s acting is excellent in the film. All of his sequences involving the heroine are interesting and well-crafted.

Satna Titus made an outstanding debut and excels in her supportive role. The intermission block and conclusion have been handled really effectively and have an important discussion.

The numerous feelings that must be evoked by an exceptional topic like this are severely lacking in the depiction. All of these moments, including the cause for Vijay Anthony being requested to transform into a beggar and becoming transformed into one, deserve to be shown realistically.The conversations that are presented are interesting and help strengthen the events. Vijay Anthony’s music is good but his re-recording is incredibly adorable. Prasanna Kumar’s cinematography is remarkable, since each of the sequences featuring Vijay Anthony as the wealthy are well filmed.Regarding the filmmaker, Sasi, while he has selected a fascinating topic for his depiction, the manner in which he has performed important parts with little passion is somewhat underwhelming.

  As a rookie filmmaker, Vijay Antony does a good job carrying out the plot, especially in the opening hour.The acting of Vijay Antony plus the movie’s heartbreaking conclusion are its finest moments. However, the movie is only passable to see due to several dull moments and a subpar soundtrack.

India Today’s Janani K. said that Vijay Antony, has donned the hats of director, actor, writer, and producer with Pichaikkaran 2, failed in his first attempt.The narrative is unbelievable, and the picture is a shambles, she added.

The Indian Express’ Kirubhakar Purushothaman granted it one out of five stars, writing,  he marked saying For some time now, even Ajith and Vijay have been steering clear of these one-man-saves-all films, and there was a respite from the nonsense. With Pichaikkaran 2, the break is gone.

Pichaikkaran 2 doesn’t really beg for our attention and nearly manages to hold us for an average watch, commented Logesh Balachandran of The Times of India.

Takkar is an Indian Tamil romantic action film created, directed, and produced by Karthik G. Krish.Siddharth, Divyansha Kaushik, and Yogi Babu lead in the film, with Abhimanyu Singh, Munishkanth, and RJ Vigneshkanth in supporting parts. This was dubbed in telugu. Takkar premiered on June 9, 2023, to mixed responses from individuals.

Siddharth  appears across the film, and the character offers a genuine portrayal as an individual who is determined to end misery. His sense of humor is superb.Divyansha does well in her job. A few violent sequences and certain comedic bits provide some relief. The picture lacks both a solid romance and exciting scenes. Siddharth and the other performers work hard to bring life to this boring action movie, but they are ultimately unable to save it.

The Times of India’s Logesh Balachandran scored the movie 2.5 on a scale of 5 stars, writing that the style swings from action to romcom and back again each ten minutes. The change of pace doesn’t feel inevitable, as the scenes are somewhat forced.

Janani K from India Today scored Takkar 1.5 out of 5 stars, writing, Takkar is a movie which could have been released in the 2000s. She said that the story is so predictable that one could have predicted each and every twist in the plot before it happened.

Mem Famous, a low-budget movie, attracted recognition owing to its creative marketing strategy.Lahari Films and Chai Bisket Films are supporting the film. This film constitutes a generally enjoyable young adult comedy. There are a number of truly enjoyable sequences in the movie, and Sumanth Prabhas who is also the director of the film and the entire ensemble did an outstanding job. The movie winds up being only an alright viewing since the latter portion manages to maintain the flow. 

The story of the film is about three of its closest companions and is based in the Bandanarsampalli town. They constitute the decision to take a step in their life at some point. They make the conscious choice to launch a tent house company with the goal of being recognised in the community. Nevertheless, Life has different ideas for them. 

Sumanth Prabhas delivered a confident performance throughout the entire film.There are a number of thoughtful passages in the initial part, which moves along at an acceptable speed. The film gets rational after its protagonist and his company resolve to accomplish a good deed with their life, despite a few funny parts that perform nicely. An important sequence that concludes the first half was incredibly beautifully done. Here, the feelings were skillfully captured.

The main problem is the use of synchronisation technology, which the creators might have omitted. This has spoiled the viewing session because the majority of the speech was inaudible. Especially good sequences got reduced in effect by the synchronisation noise. It could be preferable if producers did not favor synchronised sound recording for outside filming.Additionally, the second half’s tempo gets incredibly sluggish and numerous moments are drawn out. 

A handful of Kalyan Nayak’s songs were enjoyable to hear, and his musical style is great. His music for the backdrop is really nice. Shyam Dupati’s cinematography is superb, and his camera does a great job at capturing the rural settings.

Naga Chaitanya has collaborated with Tamil filmmaker Venkat Prabhu on the thriller flick Custody. Because of its strong promotional materials. This is released in Telugu and Tamil simultaneously. Krithi Shetty plays the female protagonist in the film.

Naga Chaitanya does a good job at portraying an underdog persona and his performance is genuine. His authentic acting he held the movie together. Chaitanya was also impressive in the action scenes.  Arvind Swami is a terrific match for Raju’s part, and there are some good interactions with him, Chaitanya, and Krithi Shetty. Krithi Shetty is a decent character who does what is asked of her.

The latter part is a major letdown, since the action is dull with no interest. Custody was written by Venkat Prabhu, who is well-known for his superb screenplays that one couldn’t believe. The action sequence had little influence on the picture. The portrayal of Priyamani and Sarath Kumar’s roles is unsatisfactory. The retrospective section is routine and lacking in excitement. A further serious setback is the music.

The picture is slow after the intermission, and the rest of the instances are quite uninteresting. It was additionally anticipated that the second half would include tense events, but there were indeed any. Considering his previous work and the issues Venkat Prabhu chooses, one would anticipate the film to live through them, yet it fails woefully.

SR Kathir’s filming is excellent. The editing is substandard since the picture seems a little long, particularly during the second half. The visual effects are poor. It was odd to witness such poor work from Ilaiyaraaja and Yuvan Shankar Raja. The songs are fairly terrible, and the surrounding soundtrack isn’t much better. 

There’s nothing noteworthy to mention. Naga Chaitanya and Arvind Swami give it their all, but the director and plot fall short. The film was panned for its extended running time and stability, and it was a box office flop.

The Times of India’s Neeshita Nyayapati awarded it three out of five stars. She also said, Custody has the kind of story that’s predictable, and some of the characters could’ve been fully realized to make this experience better than what it is.

The Hindu’s Sangeetha Devi Dundoo said that Custody is not without its pitfalls.It stumbles when it delves into a hackneyed emotional narrative. The romance, as well as some of the hilarity that surrounds it, should have been written better. “However, the film has a lot going for it.”

 “For a story that predominantly unfolds over a span of 48 hours and involves some solid chase sequences, the film wastes quite a lot of time initially in needless subplots,” commented Haricharan Pudipeddi of Hindustan Times. To have the intended impression on the viewer, the film needed to be more relentless and sharp.”

Cameron’s first film, Avatar, was a breakthrough 3D sci-fi extravaganza that was released in 2009. The watery sequel has been launched after 13 years. The one that follows is available in both 3D as well as 2D, thus it adheres to the three-dimensional naturalistic notion that James Cameron nearly single-handedly revived but that a great deal of the film industry has discreetly dismissed. However, the whole concept of the last movie’s “avatar” – the technologically manufactured figure that can be autonomously flown into an unknown area and which largely constituted an intriguing element in viewer’s 3D experience – has been discarded.

The outcomes now, as great as they have become scientifically, equate to mechanical and inactive rapid frame-rate progress slickness, producing an unsettling Mariana Trench in deepest parts rather than an eerie valley. 

In a manner, the undersea environment of the movie is its primary protagonist and its whole meaning. A fresh film was made by transitioning a life that was land-based to a sea-based life. However, the aquatic environment is overly cliched. There aren’t any fascinating graphic pictures. 

The rotten tomatoes website noted that “Narratively, it might be fairly standard stuff—but visually speaking, Avatar: The Way of Water is a stunningly immersive experience.”

The film received three and a half stars from Chicago-Sun Times reviewer Richard Roeper, who praised the film’s stunning graphics as “some of the most dazzling, vibrant, and gorgeous images ever seen on screen.”